Three Objections to the Epistemic Theory of Argument Rebutted

9 Pages Posted: 25 Jul 2008

See all articles by Scott F. Aikin

Scott F. Aikin

Vanderbilt University - Philosophy Department

Date Written: July 23, 2008

Abstract

Three objections to the epistemic theory of argument are presented and briefly rebutted. In light of this reply, a case for argumentative eclecticism is made.

Keywords: Argumentation, Rhetoric, Epistemology

Suggested Citation

Aikin, Scott F., Three Objections to the Epistemic Theory of Argument Rebutted (July 23, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1172050 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1172050

Scott F. Aikin (Contact Author)

Vanderbilt University - Philosophy Department ( email )

2301 Vanderbilt Place
Nashville, TN 37240
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
147
Abstract Views
1,043
Rank
361,495
PlumX Metrics