Publishing Standards for Research in Forecasting (Editorial)
5 Pages Posted: 24 Jul 2008
Date Written: July, 23 2008
Abstract
When we first began publication of the Journal of Forecasting, we reviewed policies that were used by other journals and also examined the research on scientific publishing. Our findings were translated into a referee's rating form that was published in the journal [Armstrong (1982a)]. These guidelines were favorably received. Most referees used the Referee's Rating Sheet (Exhibit 1 provides an updated version) and some of them wrote to tell us that they found it helpful in communicating the aims and criteria of the journal.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness, and Innovation
-
Does the Need for Agreement Among Reviewers Inhibit the Publication of Controversial Findings?
-
Management Folklore and Management Science - on Portfolio Planning, Escalation Bias, and Such
-
Last Writes? Re-Assessing the Law Review in the Age of Cyberspace
-
Yesterday Once More: Skeptics, Scribes and the Demise of Law Reviews
-
Incentives for Developing and Communicating Principles: A Reply
-
Editorial Policies for the Publication of Controversial Findings
-
Factors Influencing Academic Research Productivity: A Survey of Management Scientists