Money-Output Causality Revisited: An Empirical Analysis of EU Countries

Posted: 9 Nov 1998

See all articles by Bernd Hayo

Bernd Hayo

University of Marburg - School of Business & Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

In this paper, the evidence collected in the large literature on testing for Granger-causality from money to output is re-visited. Using a broad data base of 14 EU-countries plus Canada, the U.S. and Japan, and quarterly data from the mid-60s to the mid-90s, a number of hypotheses from this literature is evaluated. It is found that very few general conclusions can be sustained. For instance, in most countries it is not the case that the use of data in levels creates a bias in favor of finding Granger-causality effects of money on output compared to using differences. Neither does the significance of money lags decline when increasing the number of variables included in the model. What appears to be robust, though, is that allowing for asymmetries clearly increases the likelihood of finding significant causality effects. Based on the Granger-causality test results, a number of country groups are obtained using cluster analysis, which are characterized by a similar behavior with respect to the money-output relation.

JEL Classification: E40, E50

Suggested Citation

Hayo, Bernd, Money-Output Causality Revisited: An Empirical Analysis of EU Countries. Applied Economics, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=117311

Bernd Hayo (Contact Author)

University of Marburg - School of Business & Economics ( email )

Universitaetsstr. 24
Marburg, D-35032
Germany
++49(0)6421-28-23091 (Phone)
++49(0)6421-28-23193 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
456
PlumX Metrics