Which is More Value-Relevant: Earnings or Cash Flows?
50 Pages Posted: 2 Sep 1998
Date Written: May 1998
Abstract
Statements in the financial press and recent research suggest that controversy exists as to which accounting measure is more value-relevant: earnings or cash flows. This study examines the relative value-relevance of earnings and cash flow measures in the context of the firm life-cycle. Earnings are predicted to be more value-relevant in mature stages. Cash flows are expected to be more value relevant in stages characterized by growth and/or uncertainty. In general the hypotheses are supported using Wald chi-square tests (Biddle, Seow, and Siegel 1995) of the Edwards, Bell, Ohlson (1995) model. Evidence supports the hypothesis that earnings are more value-relevant than operating, investing, or financing cash flows in mature life-cycle stages. However, in the start-up stage investing cash flows are more value relevant than earnings. In growth and decline stages, operating cash flows are more value relevant than earnings.
JEL Classification: M41, M44, G12
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Relative Versus Incremental Information Content
By Gary C. Biddle, Gim-seong Seow, ...
-
The Value-Relevance of Intangibles: The Case of Software Capitalization
By David Aboody and Baruch Lev
-
Does Eva Beat Earnings? Evidence on Associations with Stock Returns and Firm Values
By Gary C. Biddle, Robert M. Bowen, ...
-
The Usefulness of Direct and Indirect Cash Flow Disclosures
By Greg Clinch, Baljit K. Sidhu, ...
-
Market Value Added and Economic Value Added: Some Empirical Evidences
By D V Ramana
-
Empirical Evidence on the Relationship between Eva and Stock Returns in Brazilian Firms
-
Linkages between Value Based Performance Measurements and Risk Return Trade Off: Theory and Evidence
By Saban Celik and Banu Esra Aslanertik