Discounting the Long-Distant Future: A Simple Explanation for the Weitzman-Gollier-Puzzle
13 Pages Posted: 30 Jul 2008
Date Written: July 2008
Abstract
In this paper, we reconsider the debate on Weitzman's (1998) suggestion to discount the long-run future at the lowest possible rate, referring to Gollier (2004) and Hepburn & Groom (2007). We show that, while Weitzman's use of the present value approach may indeed seem questionable, its outcome, i.e. a discount rate that is declining over time, is nevertheless reasonable, since it can be justified by assuming a plausible degree of risk aversion.
Keywords: discount rates, uncertainty, risk aversion
JEL Classification: D40, E43, Q51
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Consumption-Based Determinants of the Term Structure of Discount Rates
-
How Should the Distant Future Be Discounted When Discount Rates are Uncertain?
By Christian Gollier and Martin Weitzman
-
Should We Discount the Far-Distant Future at its Lowest Possible Rate?
-
Should We Discount the Far-Distant Future at its Lowest Possible Rate?
-
Expected Net Present Value, Expected Net Future Value, and the Ramsey Rule
-
Social Discounting Under Uncertainty: A Cross-Country Comparison
By Cameron J. Hepburn, Phoebe Koundouri, ...
-
Social Discounting Under Uncertainty: A Cross-Country Comparison
By Cameron J. Hepburn, Phoebe Koundouri, ...
-
The Choice of Discount Rate for Climate Change Policy Evaluation