A Performance Evaluation Program for the Federal Judiciary
45 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2008 Last revised: 7 Nov 2012
Date Written: August 8, 2008
Abstract
Judicial performance evaluation (JPE) programs have existed at the state level for over thirty years as a means of promoting judicial accountability for a fair, courteous and efficient court process. These programs have been shown to provide judges with valuable information for their own professional development, and the public with valuable information about its judges. Despite their proven benefits, however, JPE programs have never been considered seriously at the federal level. This Article describes the qualities of the most successful state JPE programs, considers the historical obstacles to federal JPE, and ultimately proposes a framework for a JPE program for United States District and Magistrate Judges that will seek to preserve judicial independence, provide information for judges to improve their performance, and increase the public's confidence in the courts.
Keywords: Judicial performance evaluation, JPE, federal courts, accountability, independence, judicial training
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
A Model of the Endogenous Development of Judicial Institutions
-
The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions
By Jeffrey K. Staton and Georg Vanberg
-
Rule Creation in a Political Hierarchy
By Clifford Carrubba and Tom S. Clark
-
The Role of the Legal Status Quo in Supreme Court Decision-Making
-
Law Versus Ideology: The Supreme Court and the Use of Legislative History
By David S. Law and David T. Zaring
-
Executive Discretion, Judicial Decision Making, and Separation of Powers in the United States
-
A Theory of Opinion Writing in a Political Hierarchy
By Tom S. Clark and Clifford Carrubba
-
Accountability and Judicial Performance: Evidence from Case Dispositions