Arbitrage in Dual Classes: The Case of Berkshire Hathaway
46 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2008 Last revised: 31 Jul 2023
Date Written: August 11, 2008
Abstract
I test the existence of arbitrage risk due to a lack of substituting securities, using the no-arbitrage condition implied by the one-way conversion rule from Class A to Class B shares of Berkshire Hathaway. This rule prevents large premiums but allows for significant and time-varying discounts on Class B shares, supporting the existence of arbitrage risk. I provide an estimate of arbitrage costs at 0.05% in recent years. I also document that Class B trades reflect both positive and negative information onto Class A prices, and that unusual price deviations between these two share classes predict future Class A returns.
Keywords: The law of one price, market efficiency, financial decision
JEL Classification: G14, G32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
An Anatomy of Pairs Trading: The Role of Idiosyncratic News, Common Information and Liquidity
By Joseph Engelberg, Pengjie Gao, ...
-
Are Pairs Trading Profits Robust to Trading Costs?
By Binh Huu Do and Robert W. Faff
-
Mispricing of Dual-Class Shares: Profit Opportunities, Arbitrage, and Trading
By Paul H. Schultz and Sophie Shive
-
How Riskless is 'Riskless' Arbitrage?
By Roman Kozhan and Wing Wah Tham
-
Ambiguity, no Arbitrage, and the Limits to Rational Expectations
By Hendri Adriaens, Bas Donkers, ...
-
ETF Arbitrage: Intraday Evidence
By Ben R. Marshall, Nhut H. Nguyen, ...
-
Pairs Trading on International ETFs
By Panagiotis Schizas, Dimitrios Thomakos, ...