42 Pages Posted: 11 Aug 2008 Last revised: 13 May 2014
Date Written: April 2011
Motivated by widely publicized concerns that there are “too many” plans, we structurally estimate (and validate) an equilibrium model of the Medicare Part D market to study the welfare impacts of two feasible, similar-sized approaches for reducing choice. One reduces the maximum number of firm offerings regionally; the other removes plans providing donut hole coverage – consumers’ most valued dimension. We find welfare losses are far smaller when coupled with elimination of a dimension of differentiation, as in the latter approach. We illustrate our findings’ relevance under current health care reforms, and consider the merits of instead imposing ex ante competition for entry.
Keywords: Medicare Part D, regulation, number of plans, product differentiation, discrete choice
JEL Classification: H42, H51, I11, I18, L13, L51, L88
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Lucarelli, Claudio and Prince, Jeffrey and Simon, Kosali Ilayperuma, The Welfare Impact of Reducing Choice in Medicare Part D: A Comparison of Two Regulation Strategies (April 2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1217662 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1217662