Conflicts between U.S. Law and International Treaties Concerning Geographical Indications

Whittier L. Rev., Vol. 22, No. 73, 2000

18 Pages Posted: 13 Aug 2008 Last revised: 8 May 2009

Christine Haight Farley

American University - Washington College of Law

Date Written: August 11, 2000

Abstract

It should not be surprising that the United States is not a major proponent of the protection of geographical indications. Countries that stand to benefit the most from this protection are those that have a long history of traditional industries, such as many European countries. These historical differences may help explain the stance that the United States has taken with regard to the protection of geographical indications, as compared to its stance towards other intellectual property rights negotiated in TRIPs Agreement. But the inability of the U.S. to benefit to the same extent as European countries, because of its apparent dearth of traditional industries, does not fully explain U.S. resistance to the protection of geographical indications. Instead, the discord is of a more fundamental nature having to do with the basic approach each continent takes to trademark law. Since the earliest days in Europe, geographical indications were used to protect certain industries. As local reputations grew for certain products, use of the place names became attractive. To some extent such markings served as a warranty for the quality of the goods. To ensure the locale's reputation, the local industry would agree to certain standards of production. The granting of a right to use a geographical term associated with particular goods exclusively to the producers within a certain region served to limit competition, especially from producers outside that region. This purpose is in contrast with the theory behind the prohibition of uses of false indications of origin in the United States. In the U.S., such use is prohibited not to protect an industry, but to protect the consumer against any resulting deception. In the U.S., generally speaking, there are no rights in a term or sign until that term or sign has become distinctive in the minds of the relevant consumer as an indicator of source. Thus, we are reluctant to view these types of terms as conveying any kind of property rights in and of themselves before they have been invested with meaning resulting from use in commerce.

Keywords: trademark law, intellectual property, geographical indications, TRIPS, free trade agreements, brand, wine, appellations of origin

Suggested Citation

Farley, Christine Haight, Conflicts between U.S. Law and International Treaties Concerning Geographical Indications (August 11, 2000). Whittier L. Rev., Vol. 22, No. 73, 2000. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1218062 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1218062

Christine Haight Farley (Contact Author)

American University - Washington College of Law ( email )

4300 Nebraska Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20016
United States
202-274-4171 (Phone)
202-274-0830 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://wcl.american.edu/fac/farley

Paper statistics

Downloads
245
Rank
101,229
Abstract Views
1,933