The Disappearance that Wasn't? 'Random Variation' in the Number of Women Supreme Court Clerks
Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science, and Technology, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 457-463, Summer 2008
7 Pages Posted: 2 Sep 2008
Date Written: August 16, 2008
Abstract
In the world of American law, a Supreme Court clerkship is a position desired by many but attained by few. In the summer of 2006, news reports revealed that only seven out of the 37 clerks hired - a mere 19 percent - were women. This outcome represented a dramatic 50 percent drop from preceding years. Yet, two Justices portrayed the change as the result of "random variation," a claim that struck many observers at the time as incredible. This essay applies standard statistical reasoning to analyze what the dip in 2006 might indicate. We show that the year's decline in women, considered as one point in a time series, was not so improbable after all.
Keywords: Supreme Court clerks, employment, women, gender discrimination, time series, reversion to the mean
JEL Classification: C40
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Nancy Leong
-
Exploring Inequality in the Corporate Law Firm Apprenticeship: Doing the Time, Finding the Love
By Bryant Garth and Joyce S. Sterling
-
Distinguishing Judges: An Empirical Ranking of Judicial Quality in the U.S. Court of Appeals
-
By Stephen J. Choi, Mitu Gulati, ...
-
The Costs of Judging Judges by the Numbers
By Marin K. Levy, Kate Stith, ...
-
Judicial Incentives and Performance at Lower Courts: Evidence from Slovenian Judge-Level Data