Prices and Productivity in Managed Care Insurance
52 Pages Posted: 8 Sep 1998 Last revised: 1 Oct 2022
Date Written: August 1998
Abstract
Integrating the health services and insurance industries (HMOs) could lower expenditure by reducing either the quantity of services or unit price. We compare the treatment of heart attacks and newly diagnosed chest pain in HMOs and traditional plans in two data sets. The nature of these health problems should minimize selection, and OLS and instrumental-variable estimates yield consistent results. HMOs have 30 to 40 percent lower expenditures than traditional indemnity plans. Actual treatments and health outcomes differ little; virtually all the difference in spending comes from lower unit prices. Managed care may yield substantial productivity improvements relative to traditional insurance.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Jonathan S. Skinner, Elliott Fisher, ...
-
The Self-Employed are Less Likely to Have Health Insurance than Wage Earners. So What?
-
Insurance and the Utilization of Medical Services
By Jonathan Meer and Harvey S. Rosen
-
By Arline T. Geronimus, John Bound, ...
-
How Much is Enough? Efficiency and Medicare Spending in the Last Six Months of Life
-
The Distributional Effects of Medicare
By Julie Lee, Mark B. Mcclellan, ...
-
Are Mental Health Insurance Mandates Effective? Evidence from Suicides
By Jonathan Klick and Sara Markowitz
-
Does Medicare Benefit the Poor? New Answers to an Old Question