Formalism and Judicial Supremacy in Federal Indian Common Law
American Indian Law Review, Forthcoming
49 Pages Posted: 21 Aug 2008 Last revised: 13 Jul 2010
In this article, Professor Skibine shows how in the last thirty years or so, the United States Supreme court has taken legal principles based on functionalism and transformed them into inflexible rules based on formalism. This has allowed the Court not only to rule against Indian tribal interests in 80% of its cases but also to achieve judicial supremacy in the field of Federal Indian law.
Keywords: Formalism, Indian tribes, Federal Common Law, Federal Indian Law
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Skibine, Alexander Tallchief, Formalism and Judicial Supremacy in Federal Indian Common Law. American Indian Law Review, Forthcoming, U of Utah Legal Studies Paper No. 08-08, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1241462
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.