8 Pages Posted: 22 Aug 2008
Duopolists selling differentiated products can generate less consumer surplus than a monopoly selling one of the products. In a Hotelling-type model where a monopoly supplies more than half of potential consumers, but not all, entry by a rival leads to a duopoly price that is higher than the monopoly price. Consumers in aggregate will be made worse off by such entry when the effect of the price increase outweighs the benefit of extra variety. When consumers have continuous demand functions and firms use two-part tariffs, duopoly can also result in lower aggregate consumer surplus than monopoly.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Cowan, Simon and Yin, Xiangkang, Competition Can Harm Consumers. Australian Economic Papers, Vol. 47, Issue 3, pp. 264-271, September 2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1242505 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8454.2008.00347.x
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $38.00 .
File name: aepa.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.