Did Blacklisting Hurt the Tax Havens?
20 Pages Posted: 21 Aug 2008
Date Written: August 2008
Purpose - This paper tests the widely-held assumption that blacklisting, such as that practiced by the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) and the FATF (Financial Action Task Force), affects the volume of financial activity associated with a tax haven.
Design/Methodology/Approach - ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average) analysis is used to explore changes across eight measures of in banking-associated activity that occurred when a tax haven was placed on, or removed from, one FATF and two OECD blacklists.
Findings - The results are highly varied. Most importantly, no substantial and consistent impact of blacklisting on banking investment in and out of the tax havens was found across 38 jurisdictions. Practical implications - The role of "speech acts" - unconnected with other developments in the havens or foreign policy measures beyond rhetoric - may not be as important for tax haven investment as previously thought. Originality/Value - No rigorous and comprehensive study has previously been done of this important question.
Keywords: -Tax havens, OECD, FATF, blacklisting
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Fiscal Paradise: Foreign Tax Havens and American Business
By James R. Hines Jr. and Eric M. Rice
Tax Policy and Foreign Direct Investment
Altered States: Taxes and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in America
Credit and Deferral as International Investment Incentives
Domestic Tax Policy and Foreign Investment: Some Evidence
Tax Policy and Foreign Direct Investment in the United States
Coming Home to America: Dividend Repatriations by U.S. Multinationals
Taxation and Foreign Direct Investment: A Synthesis of Empirical Research
By Ruud A. De Mooij and Sjef Ederveen
Income Shifting in U.S. Multinational Corporations
By David Harris, Randall Morck, ...