Posted: 17 Jan 2009
Date Written: August 25, 2008
Many incentive contracts are based on subjective evaluations and contractual disputes depend on judges' decisions. However, subjective evaluations raise risks of favouritism and distortions. Sport contests are a fruitful field for testing empirically theories of incentives. In this paper the behaviour of the referees in the Italian soccer (football) league ("Serie A") is analyzed. Using data on injury (or extra) time subjectively assigned by the referee at the end of the match and controlling for factors which may influence it (players substitutions, yellow and red cards, penalty kicks, etc.), we show that referees are biased in favour of home team, in that injury time is significantly greater if home teams are losing. The refereeing bias increases greatly when there is no running track in the stadium and the crowd is close to the pitch. Following the 2006 "Serie A" scandal we test whether favouritism emerges towards teams suspected of connections with referees finding that these teams obtain favourable decisions. Social pressure by the crowd attending the match however appears to be the main cause of favouritism.
Keywords: Favouritism, Subjective evaluation, Sport economics, Soccer, Referee bias, Social pressure, Connections
JEL Classification: M50, L83, Z13
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Scoppa, Vincenzo, Are Subjective Evaluations Biased by Social Factors or Connections? An Econometric Analysis of Soccer Referee Decisions (August 25, 2008). Empirical Economics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1254342