The Fine Line between Interrogation and Retribution
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Forthcoming
6 Pages Posted: 28 Aug 2008 Last revised: 1 Oct 2008
Date Written: October 1, 2008
The use of harsh interrogation techniques on terrorism suspects is typically justified on utilitarian grounds. The present research suggests, however, that those who support such techniques are fuelled by retributive motives. An experimental study conducted with a broad national sample of U.S. residents found that the desire for harsh interrogation is largely isomorphic with the desire to punish, and that both effects are mediated by the perceived moral status of the target, but not the perceived effectiveness of the interrogation. Results are discussed with regard to retributive justice and the national policy on interrogation and torture.
Keywords: Retribution, Utility, Interrogation, Torture, Punishment motives, Retributive justice
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Psychological Aspects of Retributive Justice
By Kevin M. Carlsmith and John M. Darley
On Justifying Punishment: The Discrepancy between Words and Actions
The Ex Ante Function of the Criminal Law
By John M. Darley, Kevin M. Carlsmith, ...
'Just for Fun': Understanding Torture and Understanding Abu Ghraib
The Function of Punishment in the 'Civil' Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators
By Kevin M. Carlsmith, John Monahan, ...
The Paradoxical Consequences of Revenge
By Kevin M. Carlsmith, Timothy Wilson, ...
Meeting Violence with Violence: The Connection between Retributive Justice and Interstate Conflict
By Rachel Stein
War and Torture as 'Just Deserts'