Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Fine Line between Interrogation and Retribution

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Forthcoming

6 Pages Posted: 28 Aug 2008 Last revised: 1 Oct 2008

Kevin M. Carlsmith

Colgate University - Psychology Department

Avani Mehta Sood

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law

Date Written: October 1, 2008

Abstract

The use of harsh interrogation techniques on terrorism suspects is typically justified on utilitarian grounds. The present research suggests, however, that those who support such techniques are fuelled by retributive motives. An experimental study conducted with a broad national sample of U.S. residents found that the desire for harsh interrogation is largely isomorphic with the desire to punish, and that both effects are mediated by the perceived moral status of the target, but not the perceived effectiveness of the interrogation. Results are discussed with regard to retributive justice and the national policy on interrogation and torture.

Keywords: Retribution, Utility, Interrogation, Torture, Punishment motives, Retributive justice

Suggested Citation

Carlsmith, Kevin M. and Sood, Avani Mehta, The Fine Line between Interrogation and Retribution (October 1, 2008). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1259698

Kevin M. Carlsmith (Contact Author)

Colgate University - Psychology Department ( email )

13 Oak Drive
Hamilton, NY 13346
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.colgate.edu/DesktopDefault1.aspx?tabid=684&pgID=3400&vID=3&dID=0&fID=4213

Avani Mehta Sood

University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )

215 Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
305
Rank
82,758
Abstract Views
2,210