Choices and Constraints Over Retirement Income Streams: Comparing Rules and Regulations

15 Pages Posted: 1 Sep 2008

See all articles by Hazel Bateman

Hazel Bateman

UNSW Sydney, CEPAR

Susan Thorp

The University of Sydney Business School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

The new Simplified Superannuation regulations for Australian superannuation provide tax concessions to retirement income streams which comply with legislated minimum drawdown rules. We evaluate these new drawdown rules against four alternatives, including three formula-based rules of thumb used by financial planners. We find that the new regulations are a substantial improvement on the previous rules for allocated pensions and, when compared with the formula-based rules, are a good compromise in terms of simplicity, adequacy and risk. We also find that welfare is lower for most individuals who follow the Simplified Superannuation rules compared with welfare under an optimal path or a simple fixed percentage drawdown rule, but that outcomes could be improved through a further simplification of the new rules.

Suggested Citation

Bateman, Hazel and Thorp, Susan, Choices and Constraints Over Retirement Income Streams: Comparing Rules and Regulations. Economic Record, Vol. 84, Issue s1, pp. S17-S31, September 2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1260456 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2008.00480.x

Hazel Bateman (Contact Author)

UNSW Sydney, CEPAR ( email )

High Street
Sydney, NSW 2052
Australia

Susan Thorp

The University of Sydney Business School ( email )

Abercrombie Building
H70
The University Of Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
0290366354 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
3
Abstract Views
480
PlumX Metrics