Systematic Scenario Selection: Stress Testing and the Nature of Uncertainty

Quantitative Finance, 15(1), 2015, January, 43-59.

48 Pages Posted: 4 Sep 2008 Last revised: 31 Jul 2015

Mark D. Flood

Government of the United States of America - Office of Financial Research

George Korenko

U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency

Date Written: February 7, 2013

Abstract

We present a technique for selecting multidimensional shock scenarios for use in financial stress testing. The methodology systematically enforces internal consistency among the shock dimensions by sampling points of arbitrary severity from a plausible joint probability distribution. The approach involves a grid search of sparse, well distributed, stress-test scenarios, which we regard as a middle ground between traditional stress testing and reverse stress testing. Choosing scenarios in this way reduces the danger of "blind spots" in stress testing. We suggest extensions to address the issues of non-monotonic loss functions and univariate shocks. We provide tested and commented source code in MatlabĀ®.

Keywords: quasi-Monte Carlo, risk management, stress testing, maximum portfolio loss, elliptical distribution, value at risk

JEL Classification: C15, C63, G1

Suggested Citation

Flood, Mark D. and Korenko, George, Systematic Scenario Selection: Stress Testing and the Nature of Uncertainty (February 7, 2013). Quantitative Finance, 15(1), 2015, January, 43-59.. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1262896 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1262896

Mark D. Flood (Contact Author)

Government of the United States of America - Office of Financial Research ( email )

717 14th Street, NW
Washington DC, DC 20005
United States

George Korenko

U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency ( email )

1700 G St., NW
Washington, DC 20006
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
462
rank
54,949
Abstract Views
1,940
PlumX