Equal Rites and Equal Rights

11 Pages Posted: 4 Sep 2008

See all articles by Melissa Murray

Melissa Murray

New York University, School of Law

Date Written: September 4, 2008


On May 15, 2008, the California Supreme Court handed down its much-anticipated decision in In re Marriage Cases. In the weeks and months that have followed this historic announcement, most commentators have focused on the decision's role in extending marriage rights to same-sex couples, and on the denomination of gays and lesbians as a suspect class, entitled to the most rigorous constitutional review. In this Remark, I argue that the importance of In re Marriage Cases goes beyond these two significant accomplishments. Although the decision has been lauded as introducing same-sex marriage to California, it also permits the state, in the name of family equality, to eliminate the marriage label in favor of another status that would apply equally to same-sex and opposite-sex couples. In so doing, the decision provides a means of circumventing a pending ballot initiative in California, which would undermine the decision's force by amending the California Constitution to preclude same-sex marriage. Moreover, in making clear the constitutional commitment to family equality the Court's decision invites us to confront important questions about marriage's role in securing equal rights and the state's role in ensuring equality in intimate life.

Suggested Citation

Murray, Melissa, Equal Rites and Equal Rights (September 4, 2008). California Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1263031

Melissa Murray (Contact Author)

New York University, School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.nyu.edu

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics