Footnotes (27)



Original Sin

Craig Bradley

Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Trial Magazine, October 2008
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 117

"Original Sin" discusses the Supreme Court's attempt to discern the original meaning of the Constitution as the basis of two recent decisions: the Second Amendment case, Heller v. Dist. of Columbia, and the much less well known Sixth Amendment case of Giles v. California. It focuses primarily on Giles, where the question was whether the defendant in a murder trial had forfeited his Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him by killing the victim. The California courts had held that this was "forfeiture by wrongdoing" and consequently the victim's prior hearsay statements against the defendant could be used. The Supreme Court, after much futile discussion of history, concluded that only if the defendant's wrongdoing was for the purpose of preventing a witness from testifying would he forfeit his Sixth Amendment right.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: Criminal Procedure, Sixth Amendment, Confrontation Clause, Forfeiture by Wrongdoing

JEL Classification: K14

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 6, 2008 ; Last revised: July 1, 2013

Suggested Citation

Bradley, Craig, Original Sin. Trial Magazine, October 2008; Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 117. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1263591

Contact Information

Craig Bradley (Contact Author)
Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )
211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 622
Downloads: 51
Download Rank: 310,091
Footnotes:  27