Can Environmental Insurance Succeed Where Other Strategies Fail? The Case of Underground Storage Tanks
Risk Analysis, 2011, 31(1):12-24
30 Pages Posted: 10 Sep 2008 Last revised: 27 Sep 2013
Date Written: September 9, 2008
Abstract
Private risk reduction will be socially efficient only when firms are liable for all the damage that they cause. We find that environmental insurance can achieve efficiency even when fines and management mandates do not. The evolution of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's and states' Underground Storage Tank programs suggests that despite the hurdles for novel insurance products, mandating environmental insurance can succeed. The possession of insurance is much easier to monitor than the implementation of a mandate to do socially efficient risk management. Insurance also addresses the problem of small firms declaring bankruptcy, which limits the economic incentive of large ex-post, i.e. damage-based, fines.
Keywords: Insurance, Fines, Risk Management, Environment, Regulation, Underground Storage Tanks
JEL Classification: G22, M48, Q51
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Big Field, Small Potatoes: An Empirical Assessment of Epa's Self-Audit Policy
By Alexander Pfaff, Chris William Sanchirico, ...
-
By James J. Murphy and John Stranlund