Prosecutorial Shaming

Adam M. Gershowitz

William & Mary Law School

September 9, 2008

This Article explores the unfortunately large number of instances in which appellate courts reverse convictions for serious prosecutorial misconduct but do not identify the names of the prosecutors who committed the misconduct. Because judges are reluctant to publicly shame prosecutors whose cases are reversed, this Article advocates that a neutral set of third parties undertake the responsibility of publicly identifying prosecutors who commit serious misconduct. The naming of prosecutors will shame bad actors, provide a valuable pedagogical lesson for junior prosecutors, and signal to trial judges that certain prosecutors must be monitored more closely to avoid future misconduct.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Keywords: prosecutorial misconduct, prosecutor, shaming, exculpatory evidence, peremptory challenges, death penalty

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 11, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Gershowitz, Adam M., Prosecutorial Shaming (September 9, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1265738 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1265738

Contact Information

Adam M. Gershowitz (Contact Author)
William & Mary Law School ( email )
South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,064
Downloads: 150
Download Rank: 155,562