Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Paradoxically Speaking

20 Pages Posted: 15 Sep 2008  

David McGowan

University of San Diego School of Law

Abstract

This essay reviews Copyright's Paradox by Neil Weinstock Netanel. It argues both that the book is the best exposition of the free speech critique of copyright and that the critique suffers two flaws. First it must cherry-pick among strands of free speech theory, emphasizing some and ignoring others. It thereby sacrifices a claim to be grounded in any conception of freedom of expression as such.

Second, in Netanel's version the critique holds that judges and legislators may intervene selectively in the expressive environment to make that environment more robust. Such intervention includes favoring some types of speech over others. To the extent this claim is true it undermines the premise that government actors are incapable of determining the socially optimal level of various kinds of expression. Without that premise, however, the free speech principle itself is undercut, and the free speech critique of copyright with it. I propose that this is the most interesting paradox Netanel's book identifies.

Keywords: copyright, first amendment, speech

Suggested Citation

McGowan, David, Paradoxically Speaking. San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 08-077. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1266835 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1266835

David McGowan (Contact Author)

University of San Diego School of Law ( email )

5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
151
Rank
163,741
Abstract Views
868