Innovation after the Revolution: Foreign Sovereign Bond Contracts Since 2003
Capital Markets Law Journal, Vol. 4, 2009
27 Pages Posted: 23 Sep 2008 Last revised: 2 Jun 2009
Date Written: September 23, 2008
Abstract
For over a decade, contracts literature has focused on standardization. Scholars asked how terms become standard, and why they change so rarely. This line of inquiry painted a world where a standard term persists until it is dislodged by another standard term, perhaps after a brief window of ferment before the second term takes hold. It also overshadowed the early insights of boilerplate theories, which described contracts as a mix of standard and customized terms, and asked why the mix might be suboptimal. This article brings the focus back to the mix. It examines the development of selected provisions in sovereign bond contracts after a widely publicized boilerplate shift in 2003. The adoption of collective action clauses in sovereign bonds five years ago moved the documentation standard in New York closer to the prevailing practice in London. However, contrary to expectations, the shift away from old boilerplate did not lead to convergence around new boilerplate. Issuers in London and, to a lesser extent, in New York, have been experimenting with diverse formulations and institutional arrangements, including trustees and creditor committees. The contracts we study, as well as our interviews with practitioners and officials, suggest that standardization may be a matter of degree, that the degree of standardization may vary across different markets, and that a shock of the sort that led the 2003 shift may dislodge a previously standard term without replacing it with a new standard - erstwhile boilerplate becomes a platform for customization.
Keywords: Sovereign debt, collective action clause, sovereign bankruptcy, IMF, innovation, standardization, boilerplate
JEL Classification: F34, F36, K22, K33, O16
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Would Collective Action Clauses Raise Borrowing Costs?
By Barry Eichengreen and Ashoka Mody
-
Financial Crises and Reform of the International Financial System
-
Bankruptcy Procedures for Sovereigns: A History of Ideas, 1976-2001
-
Structuring and Restructuring Sovereign Debt: The Role of Seniority
By Patrick Bolton and Olivier Jeanne
-
Structuring and Restructuring Sovereign Debt: The Role of Seniority
By Patrick Bolton and Olivier Jeanne
-
Structuring and Restructuring Sovereign Debt: The Role of a Bankruptcy Regime
By Patrick Bolton and Olivier Jeanne
-
Sovereign Bonds and the Collective Will
By Lee C. Buchheit, Mitu Gulati, ...
-
Exit Consents in Sovereign Bond Exchanges
By Lee C. Buchheit and Mitu Gulati