References (11)



Grading Arson

Michael T. Cahill

Rutgers Law School

September 23, 2008

Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2008
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 151

Criminalizing arson is both easy and hard. On the substantive merits, the conduct of damaging property by fire uncontroversially warrants criminal sanction. Indeed, punishment for such conduct is overdetermined, as the conduct threatens multiple harms of concern to the criminal law: both damage to property and injury to people. Yet the same multiplicity of harms or threats that makes it easy to criminalize "arson" (in the sense of deciding to proscribe the underlying behavior) also makes it hard to criminalize "arson" (in the sense of formulating the offense(s) that will address that behavior).

This article asks whether adopting one or more arson offenses is the best way for criminal law to address the conduct in question, or whether that conduct is more properly conceptualized, criminalized, and punished as multiple distinct offenses.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: Arson, Criminal codes, Endangerment, Grading of offenses, Mischief, Property damage, Special part

JEL Classification: K10, K14

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 24, 2008 ; Last revised: June 1, 2009

Suggested Citation

Cahill, Michael T., Grading Arson (September 23, 2008). Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2008; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 151. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1272616

Contact Information

Michael T. Cahill (Contact Author)
Rutgers Law School ( email )
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,711
Downloads: 61
Download Rank: 284,333
References:  11