Note on Central Planning
5 Pages Posted: 21 Oct 2008
There are 2 versions of this paper
Abstract
The rise and fall of central planning rank among the most significant events in the 20th century. For much of the century, central planning, which had catapulted Russia from a backward country in 1921 to a world-class superpower in the 1960s, was looked upon as a viable model of economic development for many developing countries. By the 1980s, however, the limitations of central planning had become apparent. Countries in the Soviet bloc were stagnant and appeared to be falling further behind Western countries in economic and technological development. In contrast, countries in Asia and South America that undertook market-oriented reforms had experienced rapid economic growth. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, most formerly communist economies have engaged in a historical transition process to market economies. Despite its initial success, central planning as a system of organizing and directing a national economy had proven to be less efficient than the market system. Why this is so is the focus of this note. After a brief historical account of the rise of central planning, this note offers a conceptual framework for understanding how the centrally planned economy is organized and how central planning works, or rather how it doesn't work.
Excerpt
UVA-BP-0459
NOTE ON CENTRAL PLANNING
Introduction
The rise and fall of central planning ranks among the most significant events in the twentieth century. For much of the century, central planning, which had catapulted Russia from a backward country in 1921 to a world-class superpower in the 1960s, was looked upon as a viable model of economic development for many developing countries. By the 1980s, however, the limitations of central planning had become apparent. Countries in the Soviet Bloc were stagnant and appeared to be falling further behind Western countries in economic and technological development. In contrast, countries in Asia and South America that undertook market-oriented reforms had experienced rapid economic growth. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, most formerly communist economies have engaged in a historical transition process to market economies.
Despite its initial success, central planning as a system of organizing and directing a national economy had proven to be less efficient than the market system. Why this is so is the focus of this note. After a brief historical account of the rise of central planning, this note offers a conceptual framework for understanding how the centrally planned economy is organized and how central planning works—or rather—how it doesn't work.
The Rise of Central Planning
. . .
Keywords: Markets Institutions Performance development, economic analysis, emerging markets
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Note on Central Planning
This is a Darden A Case paper. Darden A Case charges $6.25 .
File name: UVA-BP-0459.pdf
Size: 443K
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.
