An Experimental Component Index for the CPI: From Annual Computer Data to Monthly Data on Other Goods

43 Pages Posted: 2 Oct 2008 Last revised: 8 Oct 2008

See all articles by Timothy Erickson

Timothy Erickson

U.S. Department of Labor - Bureau of Labor Statistics

Ariel Pakes

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Harvard University - Department of Economics

Date Written: September 2008

Abstract

Until recently the Consumer Price Index consisted solely of "matched model" component indexes. The latter are constructed by BLS personnel who visit stores and compare prices of goods with the same set of characteristics over successive periods. This procedure is subject to a selection bias. Goods that were not on the shelves in the second period were discarded and hence never contributed price comparisons. The discarded goods were disproportionately goods which were being obsoleted and had falling prices. Pakes (2003) provided an analytic framework for analyzing this selection effect and showed both that it could be partially corrected using a particular hedonic technique and that the correction for his personal computer example was substantial. The BLS staff has recently increased the rate at which they incorporate techniques to correct for selection effects in their component indexes. However recent work shows very little difference between hedonic and matched model indices for non computer components of the CPI. This paper explores why. We look carefully at the data on the component index for TVs and show that differences between the TV and computer markets imply that to obtain an effective selection correction we need to use a more general hedonic procedure than has been used to date. The computer market is special in having well defined cardinal measures of the major product characteristics. In markets where such measures are absent we may need to allow for selection on unmeasured, as well as measured, characteristics. We develop a hedonic selection correction that accounts for unmeasured characteristics, apply it to TVs, and show that it yields a much larger selection correction than the standard hedonic. In particular we find that matched model techniques underestimate the rate of price decline by over 20%.

Suggested Citation

Erickson, Timothy and Pakes, Ariel, An Experimental Component Index for the CPI: From Annual Computer Data to Monthly Data on Other Goods (September 2008). NBER Working Paper No. w14368. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1276628

Timothy Erickson

U.S. Department of Labor - Bureau of Labor Statistics ( email )

2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Postal Square Building, Room 3105
Washington, DC 20212
United States
202-691-6575 (Phone)
202-691-6583 (Fax)

Ariel Pakes (Contact Author)

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Harvard University - Department of Economics ( email )

Littauer Center
Room 117
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-495-5320 (Phone)
617-495-8570 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
18
Abstract Views
440
PlumX Metrics