53 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2008 Last revised: 16 Oct 2008
Date Written: October 2, 2008
Using a dataset of survey responses from University of Michigan Law School graduates from the classes of 1970 through 1996, I find that fathers tend to receive higher salaries than non-fathers (a "daddy bonus"). In addition, mothers earn less than non-mothers (a "mommy penalty"). There is also some statistical support for the inference that there is a penalty associated purely with gender (women earning less than men, independent of parenthood), another result that is unique to the literature.
Analyzing full- or part-time status as well as work hours also suggests a key difference between women and men. Those who take part-time status are almost entirely women who take on child-rearing duties, and they reduce their work hours by an average of approximately thirty percent. These statistical results are, however, significantly less reliable because of the very small numbers of respondents (male or female) who work less than full time.
Keywords: Gender, Salary Differences, Parenthood, Child Rearing, Law Careers
JEL Classification: J13, J16, J22, J31, J44, J71
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Buchanan, Neil H., Why Do Women Lawyers Earn Less than Men? Parenthood and Gender in a Survey of Law School Graduates (October 2, 2008). GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 449; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 449. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1280464 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1280464