Philip Morris U.S.A. And Marlboro Friday (a) (Condensed)

4 Pages Posted: 21 Oct 2008

See all articles by Richard R. Johnson

Richard R. Johnson

Independent

Paul Farris

University of Virginia - Darden School of Business

Mark E. Parry

University of Missouri at Kansas City - Department of Organizational Leadership/Marketing

Lauren Killgallon

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Yoshinobu Sato

University of Marketing and Distribution Sciences

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

This case is a condensed version of "Philip Morris U.S.A. and Marlboro Friday (A)" (UVA-M-0468). In July 1993, Philip Morris executives met to consider second-quarter data on U.S. tobacco sales. Three months earlier, the company had announced a 40-cent-per-pack promotion for Marlboro cigarettes, the number-one-selling cigarette in the world. On the day of the announcement, April 4, Philip Morris stock fell $14.75, to $49.375, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 68.63 points. On June 4, the company announced an extension of the promotion through August 8. After eight months of consecutive share declines, Marlboro's share had rebounded by three points. Philip Morris executives now faced several important decisions: Should the Marlboro promotion be extended beyond August 8? Should the promotion be replaced with a permanent cut in wholesale prices? Should the prices of other Philip Morris premium brands be lowered? Finally, should the prices of the company's discount brands be altered in any way?

Excerpt

UVA-M-0657

Rev. Mar. 2, 2016

Philip Morris U.S.A. and Marlboro Friday (A) Condensed

In July 1993, Philip Morris executives met to consider second-quarter data on U.S. tobacco sales. Three months earlier the company had announced a $ 0.40 per pack promotion on Marlboro cigarettes, its flagship brand and the No. 1 selling cigarette in the United States and the world. The day of the announcement, Friday, April 2, 1993, Philip Morris stock fell $ 14.75 to $ 49.375, while the Dow Jones industrial average fell 68.63 points. The day soon came to be known as “Marlboro Friday.”

Philip Morris executives now faced several important decisions. Should the Marlboro promotion be extended beyond August 8? Should the promotion be replaced with a permanent cut in wholesale prices? Should the prices of other Philip Morris premium brands be lowered? Finally, should the prices of the company's discount brands be altered in any way?

The U.S. Cigarette Industry

. . .

Keywords: brand management, pricing

Suggested Citation

Johnson, Richard Raymond and Farris, Paul and Parry, Mark E. and Killgallon, Lauren and Sato, Yoshinobu, Philip Morris U.S.A. And Marlboro Friday (a) (Condensed). Darden Case No. UVA-M-0657, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1280558 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1280558

Richard Raymond Johnson

Independent ( email )

5430 Edith St.
77096
713-661-2661 (Phone)

Paul Farris (Contact Author)

University of Virginia - Darden School of Business ( email )

P.O. Box 6550
Charlottesville, VA 22906-6550
United States
434-924-0524 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.darden.virginia.edu/faculty/farris.htm

Mark E. Parry

University of Missouri at Kansas City - Department of Organizational Leadership/Marketing ( email )

5110 Cherry St.
Kansas City, MO 64110
United States

Lauren Killgallon

affiliation not provided to SSRN

No Address Available

Yoshinobu Sato

University of Marketing and Distribution Sciences ( email )

Kobe 651-2188
Japan

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
73
Abstract Views
1,374
Rank
107,181
PlumX Metrics