Explaining the Short- and Long-Term IPO Anomalies in the US by R&D
48 Pages Posted: 8 Oct 2008 Last revised: 17 Nov 2008
There are 2 versions of this paper
Explaining the Short- and Long-Term IPO Anomalies in the Us by R&D
Date Written: August 1, 2005
Abstract
Financial scholars who research the initial underpricing and long-term underperformance of IPOs generally attribute these phenomena to information asymmetry and investors' misevaluations. Here, we identify, on a sample of 2,696 US IPOs issued during 1980-1995, a widespread source of information asymmetry and valuation uncertainty - the R&D activities of issuers - and document that these activities significantly affect both the initial underpricing of IPOs (R&D is positively correlated with underpricing) and their long-term performance (R&D is positively related to long-term performance). Given the pervasiveness and constant growth of firms' R&D activities in modern economies, our identification of R&D as a major factor affecting IPO's performance contributes to the understanding of this important economic and capital market phenomenon.
Keywords: R&D, IPO's performance, information asymmetry, investor optimism
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing and Allocations
By Jay R. Ritter and Ivo Welch
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations
By Ivo Welch and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Don't Issuers Get Upset About Leaving Money on the Table in Ipos?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Underpricing and Entrepreneurial Wealth Losses in Ipos: Theory and Evidence
-
Common Stock Offerings Across the Business Cycle: Theory and Evidence
By Hyuk Choe, Ronald W. Masulis, ...
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert