Estate of Clack: Adding Insult to Injury, or More Problems with the QTIP Tax Provisions

35 Pages Posted: 11 Oct 2008  

Wendy C. Gerzog

University of Baltimore - School of Law

Date Written: October 8, 2008

Abstract

The article reviews Estate of Clack v. Commissioner. First, the article explains how that case was wrongly decided both in terms of the statute and in the fact that it is inconsistent with most tax elections and determination dates. Second, the article shows how this case adds insult to injury to the "women-deserve-only-income" attitude of the QTIP provisions. Third, the article explains the lack of a justifiable policy goal in giving a special tax break to remarried men with children from an earlier marriage. Fourth, the article explains how Clack has created a multitude of fiduciary liability problems when an executor makes an election under these circumstances.

Keywords: Estate of Clack, QTIP, qualified terminable interest property, marital deduction, demeans women

JEL Classification: H20, H29, K34

Suggested Citation

Gerzog, Wendy C., Estate of Clack: Adding Insult to Injury, or More Problems with the QTIP Tax Provisions (October 8, 2008). Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1996. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1281002

Wendy C. Gerzog (Contact Author)

University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )

1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States
410-837-4522 (Phone)

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
541