Footnotes (40)



Follow-On State Actions Based on the FTC's Enforcement of Section 5

Justin J. Hakala

Wayne State University Law School

October 9, 2008

The Federal Trade Commission has historically been given a degree of deference by the courts, particularly with regard to its construction of section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. This deference is supported so long as the section 5 actions are solely within the province of a responsible Commission charged with the protection of consumers and competition. But what if those enforcement actions trickled down to state Little FTC Acts, which incorporate section 5 jurisprudence and confer private actions for treble damages on parties that previously had to work within the strict confines of the antitrust statutes? That concern, raised by Chairman William Kovacic, threatens to undermine the principle of affording deference to the Commission and to handicap the agency's ability to be responsive to ever changing competitive markets. Far from disposing of the agency's utility, however, the threat of section 5 incorporation into state Little FTC Acts is overstated.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: antitrust, federal trade commission act, federal trade commission, ftc, section 5, ftc act

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: October 14, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Hakala, Justin J., Follow-On State Actions Based on the FTC's Enforcement of Section 5 (October 9, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1283261 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1283261

Contact Information

Justin J. Hakala (Contact Author)
Wayne State University Law School ( email )
471 West Palmer Ave.
Detroit, MI 48202
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 574
Downloads: 89
Download Rank: 228,981
Footnotes:  40