Temporary Components of Stock Prices: New Univariate Results
21 Pages Posted: 28 Oct 2008
Abstract
While there is growing evidence that stock prices do not follow pure random walks, the degree of existence of temporary components in stock prices is not well known. Modelling stock prices as the sum of a random walk and a general stationary (predictable) component, we propose an estimable lower bound on the proportion of total stock return variance caused by the predictable component. Contrary to the absolute value of the first-order autocorrelation coefficient estimates of Fama and French (1988), this lower bound reasonably estimates the true variance roportion in finite samples also when the temporary component does not follow a first-order autoregressive process. The estimated mean values of the lower bound reach a maximum of 10% for the equal-weighted market portfolio of NYSE stocks over the post-war period 1947-1986, while the maximum is 25% for the pre-war period 1926-46. The value-weighted market portfolio exhibits generally smaller variance proportion estimates. We also reexamine the pure random walk hypothesis using our univariate variance proportion statistic.
Keywords: Random walk, predictable components of stock prices, mean reversion, lower bound, ARIMA process, variance proportion estimate
JEL Classification: C1, E44, E47, C14
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Nicholas Barberis, Andrei Shleifer, ...
-
A Unified Theory of Underreaction, Momentum Trading and Overreaction in Asset Markets
By Harrison G. Hong and Jeremy C. Stein
-
By Louis K.c. Chan, Narasimhan Jegadeesh, ...
-
Bad News Travels Slowly: Size, Analyst Coverage and the Profitability of Momentum Strategies
By Harrison G. Hong, Terence Lim, ...
-
Profitability of Momentum Strategies: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations
-
Profitability of Momentum Strategies: an Evaluation of Alternative Explanations
-
When are Contrarian Profits Due to Stock Market Overreaction?
By Andrew W. Lo and A. Craig Mackinlay