High-Speed Rail & Air Transport Competition: Game Engineering as Tool for Cost-Benefit Analysis
Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 08-103/3
42 Pages Posted: 24 Nov 2008 Last revised: 9 Feb 2009
Date Written: October 31, 2008
Abstract
This paper develops a methodology to assess transport infrastructure investments and their effects on a Nash equilibria taking into account competition between multiple privatized transport operator types. The operators, including high-speed rail, hub and spoke legacy airlines and low cost carriers, maximize profit functions via prices, frequency and train/plane sizes, given infrastructure provision and costs and environmental charges. The methodology is subsequently applied to all 27 European Union countries, specifically analyzing four of the prioritized Trans-European Networks.
Keywords: airlines, high-speed rail, networks, applied game theory, infrastructure pricing
JEL Classification: R40, L92, L93
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Transport Investments in Distorted Economies
By Edward Calthrop, Bruno De Borger, ...
-
By Fay Dunkerley, Amihai Glazer, ...
-
Road Pricing as a Citizen-Candidate Game
By Edoardo Marcucci, Marco A. Marini, ...
-
The Preferences of Voters Over Road Tolls and Road Capacity
By Amihai Glazer and Stef Proost
-
Do the Selected Trans European Transport Investments Pass the Cost Benefit Test?
By Stef Proost, Fay Dunkerley, ...
-
A Political Economy Model of Road Pricing
By Bruno De Borger and Stef Proost
-
The Oosterweel Junction Revisited
By Saskia Van Der Loo and Stef Proost