Citations (3)


Footnotes (154)



Misuse of Scientific Evidence by Prosecutors

Bennett L. Gershman

Pace University - School of Law


Oklahoma City University Law Review, Vol. 28, 2003

A prosecutor's courtroom conduct is circumscribed by several legal and ethical constraints. A prosecuting attorney occupies two distinct but simultaneous roles in the criminal justice system - an adversarial role and a quasi-judicial role. A prosecutor in her adversarial role is the attorney for the government and may vigorously seek to convict persons charged with crimes. A prosecutor in her quasi-judicial role, however, has a different mission, namely, a constitutional and ethical duty not merely to win a conviction, but also to seek justice. The prosecutor's role as a minister of justice includes preeminently a duty to seek the truth. The duty to seek the truth derives from several sources: first, the prosecutor's obligation under due process not to use false evidence or to suppress evidence materially favorable to the defendant; second, the prosecutor's ethical obligation to have confidence in the truth of the evidence before bringing criminal charges; third, the prosecutor's virtual monopoly of the evidence and domination of the fact-finding process; and fourth, the prosecutor's unique power to affect the evaluation of the facts by the fact-finder who views the prosecutor as an expert who can be trusted to use the facts responsibly.

The following sections focus on the various ways that prosecutors misuse scientific evidence. The opportunity for misconduct is present in each of three principal stages of a trial: (1) pre-trial proceedings involving disclosure and discovery of scientific evidence, (2) questioning scientific forensic experts and introducing into evidence scientific exhibits, and (3) closing argument to the jury.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 3, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Gershman, Bennett L., Misuse of Scientific Evidence by Prosecutors (2003). Oklahoma City University Law Review, Vol. 28, 2003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1292899

Contact Information

Bennett L. Gershman (Contact Author)
Pace University - School of Law ( email )
78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States
914-422-4255 (Phone)
914-422-4168 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,372
Downloads: 228
Download Rank: 105,601
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  154