Are Investors Credulous? Some Preliminary Evidence from Art Auctions
34 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2008
Date Written: October 2002
Abstract
This paper constructs a new data set from art auctions that include auctioneer presale price estimates to examine the credulity of art investors. While auction houses typically made no price estimates before 1973, they start providing high- and low- price estimates for all artworks thereafter. Thus, we have a natural experiment to observe changes in price behavior under the influence of auctioneer estimates. We find that the price estimates tend to have an upward bias for expensive paintings and high estimates at the time of purchase are associated with adverse future abnormal returns. These results are consistent with the view that investors are credulous. They do not discount fully the strategic incentives of auctioneers. However, we have some preliminary evidence that investors may have made some adjustment recently for the systematic bias in provided information.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Art as an Investment and the Underperformance of Masterpieces
By Jianping Mei and Michael Moses
-
Art as an Investment and the Underperformance of Masterpieces
By Jiangping Mei and Michael Moses
-
How Did Japanese Investments Influence International Art Prices?
By Takato Hiraki, Akitoshi Ito, ...
-
The Careers of Modern Artists: Evidence from Auctions of Contemporary Paintings
-
Testing for Reference Dependence: An Application to the Art Market
By Alan Beggs and Kathryn Graddy
-
The Collateral Value of Fine Art
By Rex Thompson and Clare Mcandrew