Telling the Truth May Not Pay Off: An Empirical Study of Centralised University Admissions in Germany
30 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2008
Abstract
We investigate the matching algorithm used by the German central clearinghouse for university admissions (ZVS) in medicine and related subjects. This mechanism consists of three procedures based on final grades from school ("Abiturbestenverfahren", "Auswahlverfahren der Hochschulen") and on waiting time ("Wartezeitverfahren"). While these procedures differ in the criteria applied for admission they all make use of priority matching. In priority matching schemes, it is not a dominant strategy for students to submit their true preferences. Thus, strategic behaviour is expected. Using the full data set of applicants, we are able to detect some amount of strategic behaviour which can lead to inefficient matching. Alternative ways to organize the market are briefly discussed.
Keywords: matching, university admissions, strategic behaviour
JEL Classification: C78, D02, D78, I29
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
Recommended Papers
-
By Atila Abdulkadiroglu, Parag A. Pathak, ...
-
Preference Signaling in Matching Markets
By Peter A. Coles, Alexey Kushnir, ...
-
The Effects of a Centralized Clearinghouse on Job Placement, Wages, and Hiring Practices
By Muriel Niederle and Alvin E. Roth
-
Interviewing in Two-Sided Matching Markets
By Robin S. Lee and Michael Schwarz
-
Decentralized Matching with Aligned Preferences
By Muriel Niederle and Leeat Yariv
-
Interviews and Adverse Selection
By Jens Josephson and Joel D. Shapiro
