Heterogeneous Impacts in PROGRESA
63 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2008
Abstract
The "common effect" model in program evaluation assumes that all treated individuals have the same impact from a program. Our paper contributes to the recent literature that tests and goes beyond the common effect model by investigating impact heterogeneity using data from the experimental evaluation of the Mexican conditional cash transfer program PROGRESA. Our analysis builds upon and extends that in Heckman, Smith and Clements (1997) and more recent studies of quantile treatment effects and random coefficient models. We find strong evidence of systematic (i.e. subgroup) variation in impacts in PROGRESA and modest evidence of heterogeneous impacts conditional on the systematic impacts. We find evidence against the perfect positive dependence assumption that underlies the interpretation of quantile treatment effects as impacts at quantiles of the untreated outcome distribution. Our paper concludes with a discussion of the policy relevance of our findings and of heterogeneous impacts more generally.
Keywords: heterogeneous impacts, randomized experiment, quantile treatment effects
JEL Classification: C21, C14, I38
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Alberto Abadie, Joshua D. Angrist, ...
-
An MCMC Approach to Classical Estimation
By Victor Chernozhukov and Han Hong
-
What Mean Impacts Miss: Distributional Effects of Welfare Reform Experiments
By Marianne P. Bitler, Jonah B. Gelbach, ...
-
Cash Welfare as a Consumption Smoothing Mechanism for Single Mothers
-
Why Do the Poor and the Less-Educated Pay More for Long-Distance Calls?
By Jerry A. Hausman and J. Gregory Sidak
-
By David Powell