Medellin's Clear Statement Rule: A Solution for International Delegations

18 Pages Posted: 5 Nov 2008

See all articles by Julian Ku

Julian Ku

Hofstra University - School of Law

Date Written: November 4, 2008


The U.S. Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Medellin v. Texas raised many fascinating structural constitutional issues about the relationship between federal courts and international courts and the problem of delegations to international institutions. Yet, Chief Justice John G. Roberts's opinion for the Court managed to avoid direct discussion of any of this issue. Instead, it focused almost exclusively on the doctrine of non-self-execution. The Court's determination that the relevant treaties were non-self-executing lies at the heart of its decision. The focus on non-self-execution, however, does not mean that the complicated structural problems raised by Medellin do not exist. Rather, in this short essay, I argue that the problem of international delegations is crucial to understanding and justifying Chief Justice Roberts's application of the non-self-execution doctrine in Medellin.

Keywords: delegation, internationl law, international courts, constitutional law

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

Ku, Julian G., Medellin's Clear Statement Rule: A Solution for International Delegations (November 4, 2008). Fordham Law Review, Vol. 77, November 2008; Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-22. Available at SSRN:

Julian G. Ku (Contact Author)

Hofstra University - School of Law ( email )

121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States
516-463-4237 (Phone)
516-463-6264 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics