Cities in Fiscal Equalization
39 Pages Posted: 9 Nov 2008
Date Written: November 1, 2008
Abstract
Redistributive grants schemes, such as fiscal equalization, are a common characteristic of local public finance in several countries. However, large and small jurisdictions are treated differently by the respective fiscal equalization schemes that often tend to favour larger jurisdictions. This paper provides a theoretical analysis showing that efficiency considerations might justify a preferential treatment of large jurisdictions. More specifically, we show that an efficient grant scheme would enable large jurisdictions such as cities to provide more public services. Under some conditions, the resulting budget of cities will exceed that of small towns in per-capita terms. Moreover, in a setting with local capital taxation we find that an efficient equalization scheme would also allow cities to retain a larger share of own funds.
Keywords: revenue sharing, fiscal equalization, agglomeration, tax competition, municipal finance
JEL Classification: H70, R51
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Efficiency Consequences of Local Revenue Equalization: Tax Competition and Tax Distortions
By Sam Bucovetsky and Michael Smart
-
The Incentive Effect of Fiscal Equalization Transfers on Tax Policy
-
The Fiscal Incentive Effects of the Australian Equalisation System
By Bev Dahlby and Neil Warren
-
Do Fiscal Transfers Alleviate Business Tax Competition? Evidence from Germany
By Peter H. Egger, Marko Koethenbuerger, ...
-
Competing in Taxes and Investment under Fiscal Equalization
By Jean Hindriks, Susana Peralta, ...
-
Competing in Taxes and Investment Under Fiscal Equalization
By Jean Hindriks, Susana Peralta, ...
-
Efficient Revenue Sharing and Upper Level Governments: Theory and Application to Germany
By Thiess Buettner, Sebastian Hauptmeier, ...
