How CFO's Determine Management Accounting Innovation: An Examination of Direct and Indirect Effects
55 Pages Posted: 10 Nov 2008 Last revised: 12 Jun 2014
Date Written: January 6, 9
Although management accounting innovations such as Activity-Based Costing, the Balanced Scorecard and benchmarking have received much academic interest in recent years, our understanding of why some organizations adopt and implement such new management accounting systems (MAS) and others do not, is still underdeveloped. This paper contributes to the literature by examining the role of the CFO in MAS innovation. We hypothesize that individual differences between CFO's are predictive of organizations' use of innovative MAS. In addition, we propose that CFO characteristics moderate the extent to which organizations rationally adapt to (environmental) contingencies. To examine this second prediction we compare the effects of strategy and historical performance on the adoption of innovative MAS for organizations with different types of CFO's. We test our hypotheses using a combination of archival and survey data from the public healthcare sector in Spain. Our results are generally supportive of our hypotheses.
Keywords: Management accounting innovation, management accounting change, upper echelon theory, strategy, performance, balanced scorecard, activity-based costing, benchmarking, healthcare industry, hospitals
JEL Classification: M40, M46, M47, M48
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
The Effects of Uncertainty on the Roles of Controllers and Budgets: An Exploratory Study
Performance Measurement System Design in Joint Strategy Settings
What the Right Hand is Doing: Academic and Practitioner Perceptions of the Research-Practice Gap in Management Accounting