Competing for Securities Underwriting Mandates: Banking Relationships and Analyst Recommendations
46 Pages Posted: 11 Nov 2008
There are 6 versions of this paper
Competing for Securities Underwriting Mandates: Banking Relationships and Analyst Recommendations
Competing for Securities Underwriting Mandates: Banking Relationships and Analyst Recommendations
Competing for Securities Underwriting Mandates: Banking Relationships and Analyst Recommendations
Competing for Securities Underwriting Mandates: Banking Relationships and Analyst Recommendations
Competing for Securities Underwriting Mandates: Banking Relationships and Analyst Recommendations
Competing for Securities Underwriting Mandates: Banking Relationships and Analyst Recommendations
Date Written: July 2003
Abstract
We investigate directly whether analyst behavior influenced the likelihood of banks winning underwriting mandates for a sample of 16,456 U.S. debt and equity offerings sold between December 1993 and June 2002. We control for the strength of the issuer s investment-banking relationships with potential competitors for the mandate and for the endogeneity of analyst behavior and the bank s decision to provide analyst coverage. Contrary to recent allegations, we find no evidence that aggressive analyst recommendations or recommendation upgrades increased a bank s probability of winning an underwriting mandate once we control for analysts career concerns. In fact, the opposite appears to be the case. Nor do we find that banks competed successfully for equity deals on the basis of their ability to make low-cost corporate loans available. Only among debt deals sold since the deregulation of commercial banks is there evidence of aggressive recommendations helping banks to win underwriting mandates.
Keywords: Analyst behavior, Underwriting, Commercial banks, Glass-Steagall Act
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing and Allocations
By Jay R. Ritter and Ivo Welch
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations
By Ivo Welch and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Don't Issuers Get Upset About Leaving Money on the Table in Ipos?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Underpricing and Entrepreneurial Wealth Losses in Ipos: Theory and Evidence
-
Common Stock Offerings Across the Business Cycle: Theory and Evidence
By Hyuk Choe, Ronald W. Masulis, ...
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert