Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Information, Blockbusters and Stars? A Study of the Film Industry

42 Pages Posted: 11 Nov 2008  

S. Abraham Ravid

Yeshiva University - Syms School of Business

Date Written: November 1997


The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of stars and other potential informational signals in the movie business. In the first part of the paper, we explore two alternative economic explanations for the role of stars in motion pictures. The first approach is a signaling view; namely that informed insiders signal project quality by selecting an expensive star. The second approach is the 'rent capture' hypothesis, i.e. that stars receive their marginal value. These two approaches have different implications regarding stars' pay, movie revenues and return on investment. The second part of the paper contains an extensive empirical investigation of a sample of movies produced in the 90's. Univariate analysis seems to show that star-studded films bring in more revenues than other films. However, regression analysis only supports the notion that any big budget investment increases revenues. Sequels, highly visible films and 'family oriented' ratings also contribute to revenues. However, when we measure return on investment, we find that stars or big budgets are not associated with profits; if anything, low budget films seem to do better. This supports again, the 'rent capture' hypothesis. We identify some additional variables that are associated with profitable films.

Suggested Citation

Ravid, S. Abraham, Information, Blockbusters and Stars? A Study of the Film Industry (November 1997). NYU Working Paper No. FIN-98-056. Available at SSRN:

S. Ravid (Contact Author)

Yeshiva University - Syms School of Business ( email )

United States

Paper statistics

Abstract Views