The Determinants of De Novo Bank Survival

30 Pages Posted: 11 Nov 2008

See all articles by Robert DeYoung

Robert DeYoung

University of Kansas School of Business

Iftekhar Hasan

Fordham University ; Bank of Finland; University of Sydney

William C. Hunter

University of Connecticut - School of Business; Tippie College of Business

Date Written: 1999


The number of newly chartered, or 'de novo,' commercial banks in the U.S. has increased every year since 1994. These new banks are potentially important for preserving competition and providing credit in consolidating banking markets. However, like other new business ventures, newly chartered banks can be prone to failure. To investigate the long-run financial viability of newly chartered banks, we estimate a 'split-population' duration model for 656 commercial banks chartered in 1984 and 1985. To provide a benchmark, we estimate a similar model for 1,288 small established banks located in the same geographic markets. Our results are consistent with a 'life-cycle' theory of bank failure. Because new banks are heavily capitalized and hold portfolios of unseasoned loans, they are initially less likely to fail than established banks. But rapid asset growth, subpar profitability, and declining loan quality gradually erode their capital stocks. De novo failure rates catch up with, and then surpass, established bank failure rates within five years. After seven years, de novo banks are twice as likely to fail as established banks. We find similar determinants of failure for de novo and established banks, including adverse economic conditions, rapid asset growth, concentrations of risky and illiquid investments, large amounts of purchased funds, and excess overhead spending. For de novo banks that eventually fail, we find that failure is accelerated by concentrations of business loans, large amounts of purchased funds, low capital ratios, and excess overhead spending; failure was delayed by fast asset growth, holding company affiliation, and holding a federal charter. We find no significant evidence that de novo national banks were more likely to fail than de novo state chartered banks, which suggests that the OCC's relatively lenient chartering policies increased local market competition without materially increasing new bank failure. We find that low capital ratios accelerate failure for de novo banks that do fail, but we find that capital ratios do not significantly predict which new banks will eventually fail. Thus, requiring higher levels of capital for young banks does not reduce their probability of failure, but rather serves as a buffer that provides extra time to resolve young banks should they become troubled institutions.

Suggested Citation

DeYoung, Robert and Hasan, Iftekhar and Hunter, William Curt and Hunter, William Curt, The Determinants of De Novo Bank Survival (1999). NYU Working Paper No. FIN-99-066, Available at SSRN:

Robert DeYoung (Contact Author)

University of Kansas School of Business ( email )

Capitol Federal Hall
1654 Naismith Drive
Lawrence, KS 66045
United States
785-864-1806 (Phone)

Iftekhar Hasan

Fordham University ( email )

NEW YORK, NY 10023
United States

Bank of Finland ( email )

P.O. Box 160
Helsinki 00101

University of Sydney ( email )

P.O. Box H58
Sydney, NSW 2006

William Curt Hunter

University of Connecticut - School of Business ( email )

Tippie College of Business
108 Pappajohn Business Bldg
Iowa City, IA 52242
United States
319-335-0866 (Phone)
318-0860 (Fax)

Tippie College of Business ( email )

5020 Main Library
Iowa City, IA 52242-1000
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics