Tax Burden and Migration: a Political Economy Theory and Evidence
29 Pages Posted: 16 Nov 1998 Last revised: 1 Mar 2024
Date Written: September 1998
Abstract
The extent of taxation and redistribution policy is generally determined as a political-economy equilibrium by a balance between those who gain from higher taxes/transfers and those who lose. In a stylized model of migration and human capital formation, we show -- somewhat against the conventional wisdom -- that low-skill immigration may lead to a lower tax burden and less redistribution than would be the case with no immigration, even though migrants (naturally) join the pro-tax/transfer coalition. Data on 11 European countries over the period 1974 to 1992 are consistent with the implications of the theory: a higher share of immigrants in the population leads to a lower tax rate on labor income, even after controlling for the generosity and size of the welfare state, demographics, and the international exposure of the economy. As predicted by the theory, it is the increased share of low education immigrants that leads to the smaller tax burden.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Who is Against Immigration? A Cross-Country Investigation of Individual Attitudes Toward Immigrants
-
Labor-Market Competition and Individual Preferences Over Immigration Policy
-
The Political Economy of Immigration Restriction in the United States, 1890 to 1921
-
Racial and Economic Factors in Attitudes to Immigration
By Christian Dustmann and Ian Preston
-
Tax Burden and Migration: A Political Economy Perspective
By Assaf Razin and Efraim Sadka
-
International Migration and International Trade
By Assaf Razin and Efraim Sadka
-
Public Finance and Individual Preferences Over Globalization Strategies
By Gordon H. Hanson, Kenneth Scheve, ...