Contagious Bank Runs: Evidence from the 1929-1933 Period

44 Pages Posted: 11 Nov 2008

See all articles by Anthony Saunders

Anthony Saunders

New York University - Leonard N. Stern School of Business

Barry Wilson

Georgetown University

Date Written: December 1994

Abstract

This paper analyzes the behavior of deposit flows in failed banks and (a control) sample of non-failed banks over the 1929-1933 period. Evidence of significant contagion effects were found for the 1930-1932 period. No apparent contagion effects were found for the 1930-1932 period. No apparent contagion effects existed in the 1929 or 1933. It was also found that the pace of contagion accelerated between 1929 and 1932, indicative of a learning effect among depositors. Interestingly, even in the period of contagion there were a significant number of informed depositors who could distinguish among good and bad banks. This is despite the fact that this period preceded the establishment of the FDIC and the SEC and their associated information production requirement for banks. Finally, our results suggest that in the pre-1933 period there was a significant amount of depositor discipline on bad banks.

Suggested Citation

Saunders, Anthony and Wilson, Barry, Contagious Bank Runs: Evidence from the 1929-1933 Period (December 1994). NYU Working Paper No. FIN-94-048, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1299494

Anthony Saunders (Contact Author)

New York University - Leonard N. Stern School of Business ( email )

44 West 4th Street
9-190, MEC
New York, NY 10012-1126
United States
212-998-0711 (Phone)
212-995-4220 (Fax)

Barry Wilson

Georgetown University

Washington, DC 20057
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
280
Abstract Views
2,296
Rank
232,149
PlumX Metrics