Contagious Bank Runs: Evidence from the 1929-1933 Period
44 Pages Posted: 11 Nov 2008
Date Written: December 1994
Abstract
This paper analyzes the behavior of deposit flows in failed banks and (a control) sample of non-failed banks over the 1929-1933 period. Evidence of significant contagion effects were found for the 1930-1932 period. No apparent contagion effects were found for the 1930-1932 period. No apparent contagion effects existed in the 1929 or 1933. It was also found that the pace of contagion accelerated between 1929 and 1932, indicative of a learning effect among depositors. Interestingly, even in the period of contagion there were a significant number of informed depositors who could distinguish among good and bad banks. This is despite the fact that this period preceded the establishment of the FDIC and the SEC and their associated information production requirement for banks. Finally, our results suggest that in the pre-1933 period there was a significant amount of depositor discipline on bad banks.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Contagion and Bank Failures During the Great Depression: The June 1932 Chicago Banking Panic
-
Banking Panics and the Origin of Central Banking
By Gary B. Gorton and Lixin Huang
-
By Michael D. Bordo, Hugh Rockoff, ...
-
A Comparison of the Stability and Efficiency of the Canadian and American Banking Systems 1870-1925
By Michael D. Bordo, Angela Redish, ...
-
Why Did the Bank of Canada Emerge in 1935?
By Michael D. Bordo and Angela Redish
-
The Transparency of the Banking Industry and the Efficiency of Information-Based Bank Runs
By Yehning Chen and Iftekhar Hasan
-
Why do Bank Runs Look Like Panic? A New Explanation
By Yehning Chen and Iftekhar Hasan
-
Limited Liability and Bank Herding
By Viral V. Acharya and Tanju Yorulmazer