Impact of Elaboration on Responding to Situational Judgment Test Items

11 Pages Posted: 21 Nov 2008

See all articles by Filip Lievens

Filip Lievens

Ghent University - Department of Personnel Management, Work and Organizational Psychology

Helga Peeters

Ghent University

Abstract

Although faking has been identified as a potential problem in situational judgment tests (SJTs), no studies have investigated proactive approaches for controlling faking in SJTs. Therefore, this study examined the impact of elaboration on responding to SJT items. Elaboration was operationalized as reason-giving. Two hundred and forty-seven master students were assigned to either an honest or a fake condition, and to a non-elaboration or an elaboration condition. Results showed that elaboration decreased the effect of faking for items with high familiarity. Elaboration on familiar items also decreased the percentage of fakers in the top of the distribution. Next, participants in the elaboration condition rated the SJT significantly higher in terms of allowing them to present themselves more realistically and to demonstrate their knowledge, skills, and abilities. Finally, there were no significant differences in participants' satisfaction with the SJT across the elaboration and non-elaboration condition.

Suggested Citation

Lievens, Filip and Peeters, Helga, Impact of Elaboration on Responding to Situational Judgment Test Items. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 16, Issue 4, pp. 345-355, December 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1303748 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00440.x

Filip Lievens (Contact Author)

Ghent University - Department of Personnel Management, Work and Organizational Psychology ( email )

B-9000 Ghent
Belgium

Helga Peeters

Ghent University ( email )

Coupure Links 653
B-9000 Ghent, 9000
Belgium

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
4
Abstract Views
869
PlumX Metrics