Corruption: Measuring the Unmeasurable
Humanomics, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 117-126, June 2009
19 Pages Posted: 3 Dec 2008 Last revised: 30 Sep 2009
Date Written: December 15, 2008
Abstract
While the strategy of measuring and quantifying has been extremely successful, and valuable in the progress of science, it does not follow that it is universally useful. We argue that attempts to measure corruption can be counterproductive in several different ways. Qualitative and action oriented approaches may prove more valuable. A political economy explanation of why extremely distorted and biased measures of corruption continue to be used is also offered.
Keywords: Corruption, Measurement, Corruption Perception Index
JEL Classification: D73
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Thomas Roca, William Orme, ...
-
Corruption Perceptions: The Trap of Democratization, a Panel Data Analysis
-
Assessing Corruption: Expert Surveys Versus Household Surveys, Filling the Gap
By Thomas Roca
-
Peer Reporting and the Perception of Fairness
By Salima Douhou, J.r. Magnus, ...
-
Combating Corruption: On the Interplay between Institutional Quality and Social Trust