The Curious Concept of the 'Living Tree' (or Non-Locked-In) Constitution
29 Pages Posted: 1 Dec 2008
Date Written: November 30, 2008
Abstract
In this working paper the author defends originalism as the least-bad approach to interpreting constitutions of the sort the United States and Canada have. He does this by starting with a parliamentary sovereignty system, such as that of the United Kingdom or New Zealand where the elected legislature is legally unlimited in what it can do. He finishes with an American or Canadian-style written constitution with an entrenched bill of rights. To make this journey, the author argues, a set of assumptions need to be made in order to have any prospect of convincing sufficient numbers of citizens to support the move. Those assumptions all point towards some version of originalism as the best, or least bad, approach to interpreting this new written constitution. In fact were other approaches to interpreting it - those such as 'living constitutionalism' or Dworkinian best-fit interpreting - made explicit at the time as the approach that would later be used, the author argues that proponents of the new constitution could never garner sufficient support to have it adopted. Orginalism is thus tied to democratic legitimacy and preferable for that reason.
Keywords: constitutionalism, orginalism, interpretation, democracy, constructionism
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Barry Friedman and Scott Smith
-
By Caleb Nelson
-
By Thomas Colby and Peter J. Smith
-
An Uncommon Court: How the High Court of Australia Has Undermined Australian Federalism
By Nicholas Aroney and James Allan
-
A Constitutional 'Work in Progress'? The Charter and the Limits of Progressive Interpretation
-
Beguiled by Metaphors: The 'Living Tree' and Originalist Constitutional Interpretation in Canada
-
Why Originalism Won't Die - Common Mistakes in Competing Theories of Judicial Interpretation
-
By Jamal Greene