Institutional Fixes Versus Fixed Institutions

10 Pages Posted: 3 Dec 2008 Last revised: 7 Apr 2013

Date Written: December 1, 2008


A number of philosophers, policy thinkers and activists have despaired over the prospect that global institutions can bring progressive change to the international order. They advocate that those who would change things should place their hopes in global social movements rather than global institutions. This essay humbly suggests that we ought to do both. Global institutions require an active global civil society that includes social movements if they would not lose there senses of mission and purpose. Global social movements for their part require global institutions to serve as focal points for their efforts, which are otherwise threatened with diffusion and dissipation. Indeed, most global institutions are themselves the products of, and in that sense the consummations of, global movements. The relation has always been, and always will be, one of symbiosis.

Suggested Citation

Hockett, Robert C., Institutional Fixes Versus Fixed Institutions (December 1, 2008). Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-032, Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 39, No. 537, 2006, Available at SSRN: or

Robert C. Hockett (Contact Author)

Cornell University - Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics